Discover more from Adventures of Bad Hijabi
The Antagonism of the Gender Lobby
let's push through the propaganda rhetoric and get to reality
So Brooke Taylor wrote a sh1tty piece for CTV. Adam Ward edited it. If I had anything to do with the creation or editing or production of this piece of trash masquerading as journalism I would want to hide that fact and would not want my name associated in connection with this piece. Seriously, this is what passes for journalism today? How on earth are average Canadians not on Twitter or involved in the gender dissident supposed to get facts? If nothing else, someone please archive that awful steaming pile of sh1t so we can look back in a few years and point to what can only be rightfully called propaganda. Tell a lie often enough and it becomes truth. We all know who said that, I don’t have to tell you. YouTube and TikTok have become like a modern day Volksempfänger, spreading woke propaganda far and wide to the most fragile minded and emotionally unintelligent individuals of society. Now the media and many journos who work in it have been captured.
Let’s talk about what Brooke wrote and then give the factual version of the situation.
the so-called “…rhetoric that trans folks are a threat to women’s rights” —Morgane Oger and acolytes lobbied the City of Vancouver to defund Vancouver’s only remaining female only rape shelter, accusing the rape shelter of wrongful discrimination—failing to include males who identify as women. This despite the fact a ruling from the BC Court of Appeal about VRR having the right to exclude male humans from their organisation. So, not rhetoric, fact.
“Adrienne Smith … said there is no threat to women's groups by including trans, two-spirit, non-binary and gender non-conforming people.” Adrienne Smith also thinks that Harsha Walia’s incitation to vandalism and violence—burn it all down—was ok so maybe we shouldn’t be relying on Adrienne’s opinion as a rational representation of balanced reality. The notion that including males in female spaces—that’s what Smith’s woke word salad means—does not threaten females is ridiculous. Safeguards and boundaries exist for a reason. As a Muslim woman it is my religious and sex based right to have intimate spaces free from male humans of any identity. No one will tell me I am a bigot or genocidal for saying no to a man who is not my partner/husband in my private space.
It’s common sense, sex based facilities and services exist to protect people, they exist as a basic human right and no one is stopping Adrienne and Brooke from creating spaces exclusively for those who wish co-ed/unisex/gender-neutral spaces and environments, however to suggest that those of us who exercise our rights to maintain sex-based boundaries are engaging in bigotry is simply a lie.
“But if all you have known is privilege then equity and inclusion can feel like oppression, but they're not the same thing, being prevented from discriminating against someone isn't a loss of power for anyone who's behaving properly”
Again, Smith talking smack and nonsense. Who is privileged, but the one who gets to DECIDE how other individuals shall perceive them? Who is privileged but some fcuking asswipe who tells rape survivors they have privilege and that excluding males from their refuge (refuge being a space for female humans free from male humans) spaces is unwarranted discrimination?? Who is privileged but the one to tell the purveyors of humanity—who have historically been abused and killed for simply their reproductive class—they are privileged? Who is privileged but some elitist who tells poor and homeless women, refugee, and immigrant women, women who have endured a lifetime of abuse and violence from males and who do not want to be around males—that they are privileged because they set a fcuking boundary?
SERIOUSLY? AYFKM RIGHT NOW? BECAUSE I AIN’T LAUGHING.
Florence Ashley, who asked everyone not to gender animals since sex is assigned, weighs in with her profoundly stupid comment “anti-trans hate is on the rise in Canada”. Yeah, once again, asking deranged wokesters who live in a mythical alternate reality about legal human rights seems like a propagandists move to me, no journalism happening here. I encourage Florence to tell my cattle farmer best friend not to gender animals and I also encourage her to see what happens when she milks a bull.
Sebastien Roback, a researcher with the Canadian Anti-Hate Network, weighs in with his unhinged opinion that women who promote sex based rights—this is essentially what a TERF is, someone who stands up and says men who identify as women are still men and they are never going to be lesbians; apparently Sebastien thinks lesbians saying no to penis is hateful. I wonder if Sebastien thinks Muslim women who demand female only spaces are hateful, and wouldn’t this view constitute bigotry toward Muslim women? Oh, here’s a newsflash for you, Muslim men don’t want female people in their spaces either. Muslims require sex based rights. Why is Sebastien and his little federally funded hate cabal targeting female organisations?
Let’s remind everyone in the room that tyrants and autocrats hire misinformation specialists such as those driving the Canadian Anti Hate Network to lie about certain problematic dissident organisations such as Cawsbar. This is a common practise in regime countries ruled by deranged narcs and that’s essentially what the so called Canadian Anti-Hate Network exists as—a propaganda driven misinformation organisation pretending to fight hate. This is a classic soviet and CCP tactic, creating disinformation to cause chaos and division under the guise of some paternalistic statist value like social cohesion.
Brooke blathers on about the unfounded fear that [males allowed access to female spaces] will prey on women and girls oh it’s unfounded because it hurts wokesters feewings??? Lol. GASLIGHTER … DENIER … DOING ANYTHING TO GET YER ASS FARTHER … Yeah, fear of abuse taking place in co-ed toilets is unfounded. Again, I’m not laughing at this joke. It’s a fcuking joke. She provides no evidence to back up her asinine claim, we are supposed to believe her, like stupid little sheeple who hang on the word of the deranged tent revivalist evangelical preachers who lead them around by the nose. Fcuk that, seriously, fcuk it. More lies. Here are the facts which the data tell us, and I quote: [co-ed] changing rooms are more dangerous for women and girls than single-sex facilities.
Here is what happens when we let male humans into female spaces such as toilets/bathrooms. Here is the predation that wokes tell us doesn’t exist. Here is a sexual abuser who assaulted a care worker bragging about how self ID enables him to live unrecognised as an abuser and to circumvent restrictions placed to keep others safe from him. Here is a story about how kids feel weird about co-ed bathrooms. Let’s call it what it is, gender neutral is a woke euphemism for co-ed, ie mixed sex. Peeping Toms like this one and this one are likely salivating at the notion of mandating co-ed bathrooms for the sake of inclusivity. Normalising the dehumanisation of women who set boundaries leads to an increase of lad culture, which feels entitled to sexually assault women.
Nobody’s going to track me. When I get this [transitioning] surgery done, I’m going to be undetectable and unrecognizable from now on, because I’m going to have a whole change from head to foot.
To continue, in the it-never-happens department, here is a story about the U of T having to reduce co-ed ("gender neutral”) bathrooms because of voyeurism.
NB: When I put out a Twitter call for stories of abuse and safeguarding concerns re: gender neutral/co-ed/unisex bathrooms, within 3 hours the thread had 21 responses providing links to information. So, what’s unfounded is Brooke’s claim that males gaining access to female spaces, that forced co-ed toilets/change rooms pose no safeguarding risk for women and girls. I invite Brooke to investigate India, where access to safe toilet facilities is limited for many women, where families consider plumbing facilities when considering future husbands for their daughters.
The Transpulse survey Brooke quotes is not random sample, so results cannot be extrapolated, I got that factual tidbit within seconds of clicking onto that site so, again, more propaganda masquerading as fact. This is laziness, I can’t believe anyone got paid for this sh1t. And whilst Brooke is creating a tragic tale of woe I’m going to remind you that female people actually have no refuge anymore—female people on the street in the DTES, seeking refuge from violent and deranged men, seeking a place where they can go and not be around men—there is no such place for women. That’s the reality. Everything is co-ed, because asswipes are taking the piss and pretending intersectional means women are never allowed to say no to men or to anyone, that it means the erosion of sexual boundaries and safeguards. Fcuk off, that’s not what it ever meant. Intersectional never meant women must include men on pain of persecution and corrective rape! Jeezus are you fcuking daft?? What is wrong with your brains, you little fcukwits?
Brooke then drops hate statistics and fails to mention that crimes motivated by race and religion have had the highest increases over that time period. Um, hello, Muslim woman here who was kicked in the head on transit the very first day she covered her head. You’ll recall our friend Sebastien in point 6, practically foaming at the mouth over so called hate, vilifying women for promoting sex based rights. Vilification of Muslim women for their faith (it’s part of our faith practise to wear hijab and, in certain intimate situations, not be around men who are not family members) seems unwise, given the rising animosity towards Muslims, especially women, in Canada and around the world, and that a family was killed recently for being Muslim in a recent hate crime. Unlike the gender cult, Muslim women can provide hard evidence that they are targeted and at risk of harm from male violence and generally, hatred. Female people can also provide evidence that they are rising targets of hatred, terror, stalking and male violence. These are solid, long standing facts. It is a lie to say forced co-ed facilities would not pose a safety risk, that’s a very foolish statement.
Let’s talk about Statistics Canada and how it has quietly dropped reporting of sex in favour of gender. I’m going to ask—how on earth can we capture any data on trans people or on sex based issues when we are not collecting both sex and gender? We can’t, that’s the problem. So, all of the fcukery with facts and statistical collection to validate fragile minds who cannot handle anything less than total capitulation and fealty is really harming trans people, women and girls, and all citizens, and it ties the hands of policy makers who have unsound information upon which to base decisions. Genderism is the Lysenkoism of our times.
Yasmeen Persad is quoted as saying trans people face a different type of hatred. That seems obvious! Whomever said they did not? So, why are we pretending they are not trans then? It seems to me erasure of sex as a characteristic erases the trans-ness of the person, for some false mirage of validation. Do you not see the reality conflict? Saying trans people face different hatred and then insisting they are the same as non trans people? Of course trans people face a different type of hatred, duh! They transitioned from the opposite sex and the reality is human beings are hardwired to discern sex differences at a fundamental level and will respond when a person disrupts that process, it is instinctual and evolutionary.
The solution seems obvious—third spaces for trans people, an acknowledgement that sex as a characteristic is immutable, resources to help people cope with the reality of the immutability of their reproductive class so we can all stop the nonsense pretend that acknowledging sex is offensive, and a real commitment to find solutions that will serve both trans people and women and men who wish to maintain sex-based spaces and not promote deception or violate reality or force anyone to sacrifice reality and dismantle existing boundaries. Validation of an identity is an emotive concept that cannot be embedded into law without creating inequality and harm.
Brooke flips back to Sebastien, our misinformation guru who feels qualified to give us a lesson about sex and biology. He fails to convey truth of course, and does that tired thing of claiming that sex binary is a high school myth. Like countless other witless wokes, he deliberately takes the piss. I’m pretty sure Sebastien knows how babies are made and that no trans woman will ever be able to give him a baby. Humans are not sequential hermaphrodites, Swyer Syndrome is a disorder of sex development, not a woke identity, and not proof that a man who feels like a woman is a woman. Sex is about gametes. Sex is about a biology and physiology built around a reproductive system designed to produce a gamete. Those who do not produce gametes still have a membership in a reproductive class. It’s not rocket science, however Sebastien lives in gender woo woo land so there’s no reaching him and the rest of the individuals in his gender cult.
Now we get to the discussion on conversion therapy. Of course the woke conflation of sexual orientation with gender identity comes out. Only, there is no such thing as gender identity conversion therapy and none of the studies wokes will provide as proof are conducted on children, they are all samples of gay men. You can see James Cantor’s writing on this one. Latest research shows transitioning of children is experimental and we already know the vast majority of gender discordant children will grow out of it without any intervention at all. Some will turn out to be gay and there is no need to transition a gay child, only an anti gay parent would rather have a chemically castrated gay boy cosplaying daughter than have a gay son. Detransitioners exist, they are talking and they are pushing back. Maybe we should ask Brooke and her gender cult friends Who Is Keira Bell?
Do we need to remind woke assholes why Alan Turing killed himself? Perhaps we need to remind woke eugenicists that Turing killed himself for exactly the thing that wokes claim will prevent suicide in adolescents—chemical castration! NB—Puberty Blocker is the woke euphemism for chemical castration. The information and stories emerging from Tavistock in the UK have shown this—the underlying anti gay sentiment of many parents. Look, the Iranian regime doesn’t offer to pay for transitioning because it is pro trans, it does so to convert gay people to the correct sex—transitioning is gay conversion therapy in Iran, the alternative there is execution.
Here is my submission to the House of Commons Committee studying Bill C-6, which provides references to James Cantor’s writing on this topic and well as other relevant reliable references.
Smith: “the testimony of survivors should speak for itself.”
OH REALLY IS THAT WHY YOU ALL DENY THE EXISTENCE AND STORIES OF DETRANSITIONERS, BECAUSE THE TESTIMONY OF SURVIVORS SHOULD SPEAK FOR ITSELF? ARE DETRANSITIONERS NOT SURVIVORS OF SO CALLED AFFIRMATION, WHICH WAS ESSENTIALLY MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE IN EXPLORING DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES??? YES, THEY ARE, YOU HYPOCRITES! We’ll recall the way detransitioners were deliberately shut out of the testimony for bill C-6 and how the ministers and MPs involved actually denied the existence of detransitioners. Oh, but you care soooo much for survivors of medical abuse tho, right? Again, disingenuous.
The same idiot who glibly said rights aren't a competition and whose actions clearly demonstrate they believe otherwise spews this line: TERF organizations referring to things like ‘sex-based rights’ … ok so legal rights of Canadian citizens are now being put in scare quotes, because members of the gender cult somehow think sex based rights are hateful and genocidal and imaginary. I’m going to remind Fae Johnstone that both the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Human Rights Act contain protection for sex based rights, so cry harder, it’s a legally embedded reality to which female people are entitled. Also, gender cult members will note that the Criminal Code of Canada states that a true statement cannot be considered hateful by the legal definition of hate—SEX IS REAL not a crime.
Sex based safeguards for children and female people are not in any way genocidal. Gay men are the victims of male violence and have been for years, and they have never demanded access to female spaces and threatened to accuse genocide if we said no. No gay man thinks that not being allowed to use female toilets and change rooms is genocidal to gay men. That’s simply not a rational and normal way to think, that anyone setting a sex-based boundary which excludes you from using a washroom, change room, or rape shelter, or women’s programme is trying to kill you or inciting others to do so—get help if you think this, seriously. In Canada this is what hate means—inciting the destruction of others, of a group. The Keegstra Ruling is well worth wokesters’ time, to see what hate actually looks like in Canada in a legal sense. It seems to me gender extremists are guilty of hate in their activism and their abuse of lesbians, for example. They blatantly incite violence and express direct wishes and threats of violence, including rape and painful death.
“While Bill C-6 plans to ban forced conversion therapy, it does not give the government, or anyone, the power to forcibly make anyone undergo medical transition.”
That’s a blatant lie. WPATH guidelines are being followed in all provinces now and Bill C-6 has been written to reflect a WPATH approach to gender discordant children—the mere act of seeking a differential diagnoses when a child presents with the I’m in the wrong body nonsense SOGI dogma is teaching them in schools is considered child abuse by Child Services authorities, this is a known fact. WPATH is based on the belief that any non invasive therapy is harmful because only affirming the child being the opposite sex is considered appropriate. It is happening now. An experimental treatment regime that has no valid or reliable evidence backing it, that harms children, using hormones which have been shown to harm adults is now seen as affirmation. Chemical Castration caused Alan Turing to kill himself and wokes want parents to believe it is a suicide prophylactic.
And there’s that word Queer, the word many of us hate who are old enough to know the history. Queer meant pervert, it was a thing gay and non conforming men were beaten and killed for. Queer now represents queer theory, which sees all sex based boundaries as oppressive and seeks to subvert sex based boundaries and rights, this is the driving force behind the lie of reclamation of queer, they want to re-introduce the word and call it pride etc because it is a word that symbolises boundary violation, eroding consent, and abuse.
Brooke has essentially demonstrated how far removed from reality and how deeply captured by the cult she really is when she writes about the rise in TERFism. LOL, that’s just ordinary people who don’t belong to your gender cult finally realising you all have co-opted the rainbow to promote some absolutely misanthropic deranged nonsense and they are having none of it. This is parents finding out how teachers and other education professionals are deliberately keeping crucial information from parents, how they are filling kids’ heads with lies about being in the wrong body, that their parents are the enemy. This is women fighting for those spaces and rights they flipping busted their asses for throughout my lifetime! These is women who remember that we have only been persons under the law for 90 year and we are fighting for that. The notion that human beings fighting for the safety of their children, for the safety of women, for the right of female people to assemble and talk about their sex based rights, the notion of lesbians saying we don’t do dick, the notion of gay men saying we don’t do vagina, the notion of muslims saying we don’t do your gender woo we just want our single sex spaces please, the notion of female people saying no to male humans self identifying as women — none of this is rising hatred, none of this is ant-trans.
This is humanity, human rights of human beings on the ground, and not some social construct we all mustn’t blaspheme. I have to ask, is trans anti-human?
“TERFs are contributing to that baseline of homophobia and transphobia”
More lies. Gender extremism has cultivated a growing and concerning hatred of female people. Lesbians, who are female homosexuals, have no spaces left and continuously receive rape and death threats for having a sexual orientation that excludes male people. Gender extremism and the trans lobby has promoted hatred of women and the family, as well as racism and hatred of same sex attracted people more than any other ideology. From the disgusting men are women because black women are women, to referring to female people who set boundaries as vermin, to drawing an equivalence between co-ed spaces and racial apartheid—the trans lobby of gender extremism has promoted more divisiveness and hatred and has weaponised fear and has acted abusively more than any other group and with impunity since it hides behind human rights organisations, all of which it has captured.
I’m going to end this piece by stating that people promoting their own constitutional and human rights—that is what sex based rights are—is not at all hateful. No one is expressing hatred when they set a boundary. That’s gaslighting from abusive narcissists. Wokes seem to want to spread hatred whilst they claim to be fighting it. Wokes seek to divide, they simply want to burn it all down, they want to subvert everything and everyone, use anyone they can stand on, body snatch children whom they have lied to and indoctrinated in secret. Wokes are obsessed with hatred, maybe it is time we asked why—we see things as they are, Catholic mystic Thomas Merton wrote. Indeed, we do, and wokes demonstrate that beautifully in their deranged vision of social justice.
I find it interesting how the same crowd who would have us believe vaccinated peeps must practise mask sharia and worship the face mask by wearing it forever because safety also are trying to feed me the bullsh1t sandwich that sex based rights and safeguarding for children and women are hate manipulations. That’s pretty rich, pretty fcuking rich.
How about nah?
Brooke’s piece is purely propaganda and not objective journalism—she never bothered to accurately capture the other side of the story, she got with her cult buddies and created her web of woke disinformation. She never interviewed any sex-based activists or organisations, any gender critical trans people, any detransitioners, any clinical people who have been whistleblowers. Brooke never mentioned Keira Bell, she never mentioned Tavistock, never even touched on the ruling. This is as one-way as a one way street.
Has journalism in this country really become this intellectually mediocre and deprived pablum fed to us like we are babies unable to digest solid facts and think critically for ourselves? Is this because woke tyrants are afraid we will think thoughts of which they disapprove?
Where are the real journos and critical thinkers and rational skeptics in this country? It’s time we all stood up, pushed back and took our reality back from these deranged authoritarians pretending to be progressive human rights activists.
The illustrations in this piece are drawn by me. I am available for commission, you can view a gallery of my art here to see my style, and you can see my commission gallery here. You can find prints and other items featuring my artwork in my Shoppe.