Since We Are Talking About Heads of States Cavorting with Serial Predators
do you remember how the King of Canada had England’s most prolific & paedophilic sexual predator as his close acquaintance & advisor?
In a 1990 letter, then Prince and now King Charles wrote to Jimmy Savile, “You are so good at understanding what makes people operate and you’re wonderfully sceptical and practical!”
Arguably one of Britain’s most prolific charity fundraisers, the widely loved and hugely famous celebrity abused at least 500 people (mostly women and children) over a period spanning half a century, that began in 1955. Police forces across England received complaints from victims of Savile. West Yorkshire, North Yorkshire, Sussex, and Surrey police each received multiple complaints that went nowhere fast, and no police investigation connected the dots on England’s most prolific serial abuser.
Why am I telling you this, reader?
Because people who live in glass houses oughtn’t throw stones.
Vocal members of the progressive mob continues to let TDS eat their brains. Above we can see Andrew Coyne having a normal one, trotting out some obscure opt-in poll conducted online, with a sample size N = 1770, the majority of them Democrat leaning. Apparently 800 people accurately represents all Americans, that’s the new progressive math, reader!
Like I said, glass houses, reader. The current head of state for Canada, King Charles III, had as his close friend-confident-advisor his country’s most prolific serial predatory offender. Savile abused victims raging in age from young children to the elderly. The sick and vulnerable count amongst his prey — Savile abused 60 patients at Stoke Mandeville Hospital.
Victims who suffered abuse at Stoke Mandeville include a young girl of age 8 or 9, whom Savile raped on 10 different occasions.
The first rape took place in a fairly public area. When she cried and complained of the pain during the abuse, Savile told her to stop crying and not to tell anyone. She said Savile was extremely strong and revered by all around him. — via The Guardian, 25.2.2015
Amongst Savile’s depravities, we count the admission that “he interfered with patients’ corpses, taking grotesque photographs and stealing glass eyes for jewellery, over two decades at the mortuary of Leeds general infirmary.” (Guardian 26.6.2014)
Savile visited the official residence of Charles several times and staff reported seeing Savile make the rounds to all the female staff and rub his lips up their arms. Needless to say, his odd and inappropriate behaviour, whilst not criminal, did raise some red flags. Savile even functioned as a marriage counsellor to Charles and Diana, raising eyebrows and red flags even further. At no time did concerned royal staff or aides raise their concerns formally with Charles or the Royal Family. As the Guardian notes, this entire situation raises questions as to how such a vile abusive predacious man got so close to the heir to the throne.
The level of admiration and reverence Savile received from the entire country shielded him from any accountability, or even suspicion, for his horrific crimes. Who would think such a nice man like Savile could do any awful things that ordinary little people across England accused him of doing? Surely not Jimmy, who fixes it, and doesn’t do bad things! *Sarcasm*
In 1983, Margaret Thatcher advocated for Savile to get a knighthood. She bullheadly pushed through, despite receiving cautions about this course of action.
“The case of Jimmy Savile is difficult. Mr Savile is a strange and complex man. He deserves high praise for the lead he offers in giving quiet background help to the sick. But he has made no attempt to deny the accounts in the press about his private life.” — Sir Robert Armstrong, 1983
“My committee and I still fear that his manner of life - on his own confession - has been such that a high award for him would be an unhelpful signal when we are still grappling with an Aids problem which threatens to intensify.” — Sir Robin Butler, 1987
The Royal establishment claims it had no clue about Savile’s paedophilia and rapey behaviour and generally predacious behaviour. So, how come John Lydon of Sex Pistols fame knew about Jimmy Savile’s seediness in 1978? Reader, did you know that the BBC banned Lydon for that comment he made regarding Savile? And how come Armstrong and Butler seemed to have concerns about the suitability of Savile for the honour of knighthood?
Savile received his knighthood in 1990.
A report released in 2013 revealed 214 crimes attributed to Savile registered across 28 police forces throughout the country. But no one had any idea at all that this man who would come to have a close connection to the heir to the throne and serve as his advisor did bad things? Really?
But shhh, reader. Remember that Lydon was right, we aren’t allowed to talk about such things. Stay on script. Orange Man Bad.
Look, reader, I’m not a Trump groupie. Just a fact groupie. I’m also painfully aware that the accepted truth can often have little to do with the actual facts!
You know, it may well be that many well known and powerful people dabbled in Epstein and Maxwell’s enterprise of offering young girls for entertainment etc etc purposes. I don’t doubt that for a minute. That’s how high society works, always has done, too. It’s nothing new. I don’t know anything about direct evidence linking Trump to committing any crimes of the Epstein variety.
I haven’t seen any photos of Trump of the kind that have surfaced about Prince Andrew.
I’ve heard the recording of Trump saying he banned Epstein from Mar-a-Largo for taking his young female staff.
I’ve seen photos of Trump and Epstein together. As I’ve seen photos of Clinton and Epstein together.
For that matter, we’ve all seen the photos of Mark and Diane Carney with Ghislaine Maxwell, haven’t we?
BFD, reader. They’re photos and mean very little, except to conspiracy theorists.
Association isn’t causation. And an online opt-in survey of 1777 Americans means nothing.
