Canada is a Misogynist Organised Crime Gang Cosplaying a G7 Nation

in which I ask, what’s the point of our “legal system”?

scene of Shahnaz Pestonji’s murder

14 year old [insert name here] talking about murdering 71 year old grandmother Shahnaz Pestonji: “She didn't give me the keys so I yoked her.” — summary of a video post believed to be from the 14 year old male who stabbed Shahnaz Pestonji via Xwitter.

Multiple sources say [insert name here] was out on bail at the time he stabbed retired nurse Pestonji to death in a parking because she refused to give him the keys to her cars.

I have blocked the suspect’s name because it’s illegal to publish his name or photo now that Toronto Police have arrested him. The Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) protects a cold blooded killer of a 71 year old wife, mother, grandmother, and retired nurse. This is second senior woman murdered brutally by a teenaged boy in as many months. The Supreme Court of Canada SCC recently issued a ruling that essentially rewrites the YCJA legislation in a 7 to 2 decision.

In their ruling the SCC overturned an adult sentence handed down to a young man who, on 24 January 2011, when 7 months away from his 18th birthday, murdered another young man that young man’s yard. According to the Ontario Court of Appeal, three adult men joined 17 year old I.M. in beating and stabbing the young man, known only as S.T. The three men were charged with first and second degree murder.

From the Ontario Court of Appeal ruling:

[3] On January 24, 2011, S.T. was outside his home shovelling snow when at least four males, including the appellant, arrived, intending to rob him. A physical altercation ensued in which S.T. was fatally stabbed. Several men entered the victim's home. The first man to enter hit S.T.’s mother in the head twice with a gun. The second man to enter punched her and forced her to sit on a chair in an interior porch with her head between her knees. The men left the home when the victim's father and brother arrived.

[4] S.T.’s father and brother found him in an alleyway adjacent to his home, mortally wounded. He had suffered 12 stab wounds and 10 blunt force injuries. He had three significant wounds on the body: (i) a deep stab wound on the side of his nose, (ii) another to his back penetrating his right lung, and (iii) a third to the middle of his lower back entering his right kidney. No defensive-type injuries were present on S.T.’s forearms or hands. Dr. Toby Rose, a forensic pathologist, conducted an autopsy on the body and concluded that several possibilities could be derived from the lack of defensive-type injuries. First, S.T. may have been restrained when he was stabbed. Second, S.T. may have been unconscious because of blood loss when he was stabbed. Finally, S.T. may have been stabbed from behind.

“Under this new interpretation of the YCJA, Crowns have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt (99% certainty) that the offender has the appropriate “developmental age” and “capacity for moral judgment.” This will make adult prosecutions incredibly onerous, if not impossible. Factors determining maturity include age, sophistication, capacity for moral judgment, susceptibility to influence, post-offence conduct, and, of course, systemic discrimination.

This all seems to favour those with rough personal backgrounds, those prone to gang life, etc.” — Jamie Saronak

“Worth noting that the Supreme Court of Canada's majority judgment is not only incompatible with the legislative intent behind the Youth Criminal Justice Act, but overturns a consistent line of appellate jurisprudence, as Côté & Rowe JJ. note in dissent.” — Kerry Sun

In their dissenting opinion, Justices Côté and Rowe wrote:

The presumption of diminished moral blameworthiness [of young persons] is not a fact to prove; it is a legal standard. To rebut that presumption, the Crown must satisfy the court that the youth offender has the level of “maturity, moral sophistication and capacity for independent judgment of an adult” (W. (M.), at paras. 97‑98). This does not create a factual inquiry, as the majority finds, because, in our view, determining whether the presumption of diminished moral blameworthiness has been rebutted is an evaluative question that a youth court sentencing judge must consider in reference to the totality of evidence. The final conclusion a court must draw as to whether it is satisfied that the presumption has been rebutted is not a “fact”. Rather, it is a standard of persuasion, and one that is not equipped to be laid on a scale of probabilities.

Reader, I’m angry as a hornet about this. I’m angry as a hornet about the nonexistence of criminal justice in Canada. I’m angry as a hornet about the ongoing systemic and institutional objectification and dehumanisation of female people in Canada, perpetrated under the guise of “ gender equality” and “ trans rights”. I’m angry that we’ve got a country of weak pathetic amoral cowards as citizens who sit back and watch the government implement a policy of state mandated rape for carceral women, again under the guise of “ gender identity rights” and “gender diverse rights”. I’m angry this country has devolved into a psychotic and narcissistic gang of elites who misappropriate public funds, engage in nepotistic practises, apply the weak laws unequally, institutionally normalise racism and misogyny, allow the glorification of terrorism, and tacitly endorse violence, hatred, and irresponsibility as progressive ways to operate a society. We aren’t a country, reader we are an organised crime gang pretending to be a G7 Nation.

As Ron Chhinzer reminds us in a recent Xwitter post, Shahnaz Pestonji isn’t the first senior woman to die from a stabbing perpetrated by a 14 year old boy.

Eleanor Doney with her husband, undated Facebook photo

“On May 29, 83-year-old Eleanor Doney, a retired teacher, was stabbed to death while gardening in her front yard in Pickering. It was a completely random attack. A 14-year-old boy was arrested and charged with murder.”

Shahnaz Pestonji with her family

“Just a few days ago, 71-year-old Shahnaz Pestonji was stabbed and killed during a carjacking in a North York parking lot after loading her groceries. Police believe the killer was also a 14-year-old, who wore a mask and recorded a video talking about how he wanted to steal her car. In the video, he (allegedly) admits she didn’t give up her keys, so he stabbed her. She died later in hospital.”

And yet the radically Wokerati-infested and incompetent SCC has made it nearly impossible to try these violent adolescent killers as adults.

from Statistica 2025

Reader, look at the trend in violent crime statistics. Trudeau became PM in 2015. Since he took power the numbers have steadily climbed.

Reader, why are 14 year olds stabbing old ladies? Where are the parents or guardians? Where is anyone to stand up for and protect female people in Canada? What happened to accountability? What happened to moral responsibility and integrity? The boy who stabbed Pestonji because she refused to give him the keys to her car went on social media and bragged about what he did. He can brag about it on social media, so why do we need to pretend to protect his identity? Why do we need to debate his moral blameworthiness and his culpability? He is morally blameworthy. He is culpable. Why pretend otherwise, reader?

Apparently 14 year olds can decide to make medical decisions for themselves without parental consent or involvement. So this 14 year old killer could decide he’s a woman and choose to change his name and sex on his identification and he could consent to take androgen hormone blockers and toxic doses of feminising cross sex hormones. Effectively we can give this kid a sex change and we can’t name him or show his image publicly and we can’t try him as an adult for stabbing a woman to death in a carjacking gone wrong?

Reader, something has gone terribly and horribly wrong with Canada’s legal system.